Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE)
EAES Academy. Fuchshuber P. 06/01/18; 218663 Disclosure(s)(s): no disclosures for speaker Pascal Fuchshuber
Pascal Fuchshuber
Pascal Fuchshuber
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.
Learning Objectives
Abstract
References
Discussion Forum (0)
Rate & Comment (0)
Understanding basic underlying principles of electrosurgical instrument.
Discuss risk and dangers of using electrosurgical instruments.
Describe need for education on energy devices for surgeons.
Operating room (OR) safety has become a major concern in patient safety in the last decade. Improvement of team communication and behavior is a popular target for safety programming at the institutional level. Despite these efforts, essential safety gaps in the OR and procedure rooms remain. A prime example is the use of energy-based devices in ORs and procedural areas. The lack of fundamental understanding of energy device function, design, and application contributes to avoidable injury and harm at a rate of approximately 1-2 per 1000 patients in the US. Hundreds of operating room fires occur each year in the United States, some causing severe injury and even mortality. Most are associated with the use of surgical energy devices. In response to this safety issue, the Society of American Gastroenterologic and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) developed the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) Program. FUSE includes a standardized curriculum targeted to surgeons, other physicians, and allied health care professionals and a psychometrically designed and validated certification test. A successful FUSE certification will document the acquisition of the basic knowledge needed to safely use energy-based devices in the operating room. FUSE was designed, and continues to evolve, to fill a void that exists in curriculum, regulation, and competency assessment in the use of energy devices in patients by surgeons, endoscopists, and others.
1. Banki F, Ochoa K, Carrillo ME, et al. A surgical team with focus on staff education in a community hospital improves outcomes, costs and patient satisfaction. Am J Surg. 2013;206(6):1007-1014.
2. ECRI Institute. Top 10 health technology hazards for 2012. Available at: https://www.ecri.org/Products/Pages/Top-10-Hazards-Resources.aspx. Accessed April 14, 2014.
3. Govekar HR, Robinson TN, Varosy PD et al. Effect of monopolar radiofrequency energy on pacemaker function. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(10):2784-2788.
4. Nduka CC, Super PA, Monson JR, Darzi AW. Cause and prevention of electrosurgical injuries in laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg.1994;179(2):161-170.
5. Sankaranarayanan G, Resapu RR, Jones DB, Schwaitzberg S, De S. Common uses and cited complications of energy in surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(9): 3056-3072.
6. Agarwal BB, Gupta M, Agarwal S, Mahajan K. Anatomical footprint for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy without using any energy source: A modified technique. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21(12):2154-2158.
7. Gol M, Kizilyar A, Eminoglu M. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with retroperitoneal uterine artery sealing using LigaSure: Gazi hospital experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;276(4):311-314.
8. Kriplani A, Garg P, Sharma M, Lal S, Agarwal N. A review of total laparoscopic hysterectomy using LigaSure uterine artery-sealing device: AIIMS experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008;18(6):825-829.
9. Polychronidis A, Tsaroucha AK, Karayiannakis AJ, Perente S, Efstathiou E, Simopoulos C. Delayed perforation of the large bowel due to thermal injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Int Med Res. 2005;33(3):360-363.
10. Siperstein A, Garland A, Engle K, et al. Local recurrence after laparoscopic radiofrequency thermal ablation of hepatic tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7(2): 106-113.
11. Darai E, Ackerman G, Bazot M, Rouzier R, Dubernard G. Laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis: Limits and complications. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(9):1572-1577.
12. Peterson HB, Ory HW, Greenspan JR, Tyler CW Jr. Deaths associated with laparoscopic sterilization by unipolar electrocoagulating devices, 1978 and 1979. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 139(2):141-143.
13. Willson PD, van der Walt JD, Moxon D, Rogers J. Port site electrosurgical (diathermy) burns during surgical laparoscopy. Surg Endosc.1997; 11(6):653-654.
14. Schwaitzberg SD. Evolution and revolutions in surgical energy. In: Feldman LS, Fuchshuber P, Jones DB, eds. The Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) Manual. New York, NY: Springer; 2012:3.
15. O’Connor JL, Bloom DA. William T. Bovie and electrosurgery. Surgery. 1996; 119(4):390-396.
16. Chambers JJ, Saha AK. Electrocution during anesthesia. Anesthesia. 1979;34(2):173-175.
17. Wills JH, Ehrenwerth J, Rogers D. Electrical injury to a nurse due to conductive fluid in an operating room designated as a dry location. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:1647–1649.
18. Cormier B, Nezhat F, Sternchos J, Sonoda Y, Leitao MM Jr. Electrocautery-associated vascular injury during robotic-assisted surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(2 Pt 2):491-493.
19. LeBlanc KA, Elieson MJ, Corder JM III. Enterotomy and mortality rates of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: A review of the literature. JSLS. 2007; 11(4):408-414.
20. Bishoff JT, Allaf ME, Kirkels W, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR, Schroder F. Laparoscopic bowel injury: Incidence and clinical presentation. J Urol.1999;161(3):887.
21. Market engineering research for the U. S. market for general surgery laparoscopy access and closure instruments. Medical and Healthcare Marketplace Guide, 1999. London, UK: Frost and Sullivan.
22. Voyles CR, Tucker RD. Education and engineering solutions for potential problems with laparoscopic monopolar electrosurgery. Am J Surg. 1992;164(1):57-62.
23. Tucker RD, Voyles CR. Laparoscopic electrosurgical complications and their prevention. AORN J. 1995:62(1):51-59.
24. Harrell GJ, Kopps DR. Minimizing patient risk during laparoscopic electrosurgery. AORN J. 1998; 67(6):1194-1205.
25. Wu MP, Ou CS, Chen SL, Yen EY, Rowbotham R. Complications and recommended practices for electrosurgery in laparoscopy. Am J Surg. 2000; 179(1):67-73.
26. Alkatout I, Schollmeyer T, Hawaldar NA, Sharma N, Mettler L. Principles and safety measures of electrosurgery in laparoscopy. JSLS. 2012;16(1):130-139.
27. Tucker RD. Laparoscopic electrosurgical injuries: Survey results and their implications. Surg Laparosc Endosc.1995;5(4):311-317.
28. Brill AI, Feste JR, Hamilton TL, et al. Patient safety during laparoscopic monopolar electrosurgery—principles and guidelines. Consortium on Electrosurgical Safety During Laparoscopy. JSLS. 1998;2(3):221-225.
29. Recommended practices for electrosurgery. In: Perioperative Standards and Recommended Practices. Denver, CO: AORN, Inc; 2011:99-118..
30. Feldman LS, Brunt LM, Fuchshuber P, et al. Rationale for the fundamental use of surgical Energy (FUSE) curriculum assessment: Focus on safety. SAGES FUSE Committee. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(11):4054-4059.
31. Feldman LS, Fuchshuber P, Jones DB, Mischna J, Schwaitzberg SD. FUSE (Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy) Task Force. Surgeons don't know what they don't know about the safe use of energy in surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(10):2735-2739.
32. Feldman LS, Fuchshuber P, Jones DB, eds. The Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) Manual. New York, NY: Springer; 2012.
33. Madani A, Watanabe Y, Vassiliou MC, et al. Impact of a hands-on component on learning in the Fundamental Use Of Surgical Energy (FUSE) curriculum: A randomized-controlled trial in surgical trainees. Surg Endosc. May 2, 2014. [Epub ahead of print].
34. Allen BF, Schwaitzberg SD, Jones DB, De S. Toward the development of a virtual electrosurgery training simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;196:11-13.
Code of conduct/disclaimer available in General Terms & Conditions

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies