The optimal timing of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous cholecystostomy in Acute cholecystitis
EAES Academy. Abdelsaid K. 07/05/22; 363026; P070
CLICK HERE TO LOGIN
REGULAR CONTENT
REGULAR CONTENT
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.
Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)
Rate & Comment (0)
Introduction:
Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an effective option for high risk and/or delayed presented Acute cholecystitis (AC). However, the optimal timing for subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) as a definitive treatment remains controversial.
Methods:
This study includes 41 patients underwent LC following PC for severe AC. We compared the length of tube insertion, period from PC till LC and period from PC removal till LC against co-morbidities, another attack of AC, subsequent pancreatitis/jaundice and operative difficulties in terms of intraoperative adhesions, drain insertion, conversion to open, length of operation.
Results:
The median time of length of tube insertion was 36 days (range 5-208) while the median time of PC insertion till LC was 144 days (range 31-744) and for period from PC removal till LC was 78 days (range 0-714). Patients with prolonged tube insertion (more than a month) showed higher risk of developing subsequent pancreatitis and or jaundice (P=0.04) while intraoperative adhesions was associated with prolonged time from tube insertion till operation (more than 4 months). There was no significant association between neither the length of tube insertion, period from PC insertion till LC nor period from PC removal till LC and other studied parameters.
Conclusion:
prolonged time of PC insertion and/or prolonged time form PC insertion till LC in patients with AC have higher risk of pancreatitis and surgical difficulties. Further studies including larger number of patients’ sample is warranted to confirm the outcomes and determine the optimal time of LC following PC in those patients.
Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an effective option for high risk and/or delayed presented Acute cholecystitis (AC). However, the optimal timing for subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) as a definitive treatment remains controversial.
Methods:
This study includes 41 patients underwent LC following PC for severe AC. We compared the length of tube insertion, period from PC till LC and period from PC removal till LC against co-morbidities, another attack of AC, subsequent pancreatitis/jaundice and operative difficulties in terms of intraoperative adhesions, drain insertion, conversion to open, length of operation.
Results:
The median time of length of tube insertion was 36 days (range 5-208) while the median time of PC insertion till LC was 144 days (range 31-744) and for period from PC removal till LC was 78 days (range 0-714). Patients with prolonged tube insertion (more than a month) showed higher risk of developing subsequent pancreatitis and or jaundice (P=0.04) while intraoperative adhesions was associated with prolonged time from tube insertion till operation (more than 4 months). There was no significant association between neither the length of tube insertion, period from PC insertion till LC nor period from PC removal till LC and other studied parameters.
Conclusion:
prolonged time of PC insertion and/or prolonged time form PC insertion till LC in patients with AC have higher risk of pancreatitis and surgical difficulties. Further studies including larger number of patients’ sample is warranted to confirm the outcomes and determine the optimal time of LC following PC in those patients.
Introduction:
Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an effective option for high risk and/or delayed presented Acute cholecystitis (AC). However, the optimal timing for subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) as a definitive treatment remains controversial.
Methods:
This study includes 41 patients underwent LC following PC for severe AC. We compared the length of tube insertion, period from PC till LC and period from PC removal till LC against co-morbidities, another attack of AC, subsequent pancreatitis/jaundice and operative difficulties in terms of intraoperative adhesions, drain insertion, conversion to open, length of operation.
Results:
The median time of length of tube insertion was 36 days (range 5-208) while the median time of PC insertion till LC was 144 days (range 31-744) and for period from PC removal till LC was 78 days (range 0-714). Patients with prolonged tube insertion (more than a month) showed higher risk of developing subsequent pancreatitis and or jaundice (P=0.04) while intraoperative adhesions was associated with prolonged time from tube insertion till operation (more than 4 months). There was no significant association between neither the length of tube insertion, period from PC insertion till LC nor period from PC removal till LC and other studied parameters.
Conclusion:
prolonged time of PC insertion and/or prolonged time form PC insertion till LC in patients with AC have higher risk of pancreatitis and surgical difficulties. Further studies including larger number of patients’ sample is warranted to confirm the outcomes and determine the optimal time of LC following PC in those patients.
Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an effective option for high risk and/or delayed presented Acute cholecystitis (AC). However, the optimal timing for subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) as a definitive treatment remains controversial.
Methods:
This study includes 41 patients underwent LC following PC for severe AC. We compared the length of tube insertion, period from PC till LC and period from PC removal till LC against co-morbidities, another attack of AC, subsequent pancreatitis/jaundice and operative difficulties in terms of intraoperative adhesions, drain insertion, conversion to open, length of operation.
Results:
The median time of length of tube insertion was 36 days (range 5-208) while the median time of PC insertion till LC was 144 days (range 31-744) and for period from PC removal till LC was 78 days (range 0-714). Patients with prolonged tube insertion (more than a month) showed higher risk of developing subsequent pancreatitis and or jaundice (P=0.04) while intraoperative adhesions was associated with prolonged time from tube insertion till operation (more than 4 months). There was no significant association between neither the length of tube insertion, period from PC insertion till LC nor period from PC removal till LC and other studied parameters.
Conclusion:
prolonged time of PC insertion and/or prolonged time form PC insertion till LC in patients with AC have higher risk of pancreatitis and surgical difficulties. Further studies including larger number of patients’ sample is warranted to confirm the outcomes and determine the optimal time of LC following PC in those patients.
Code of conduct/disclaimer available in General Terms & Conditions
{{ help_message }}
{{filter}}